[ad_1]

Microphones are experiencing their second youth. If earlier they were used only for professional purposes (usually when shooting movies or TV shows, as well as on radio stations), now such devices are needed by an ordinary person. From now on, it is not difficult to connect a microphone to a camera or smartphone to record video for a home archive with good sound. Also, it is difficult for a self-respecting video blogger to do without a decent dynamic or condenser microphone. In short, the online magazine Expertology is going to introduce you to the best microphones. All models presented in this rating are freely sold in Russian retail.

How to choose a quality microphone

A good microphone is indispensable now, especially if you are going to shoot video on an ongoing basis. Of course, smartphones, camcorders, and even cameras also have their own microphone. However, the quality of their work is far from ideal. And if the sound seems unpleasant to the viewer, he will definitely not watch your video to the end. That is why the microphone as a separate device must be chosen sensible.

First of all, you need to decide on the type of microphone. The most popular are the following:

  1. Lapel microphone – fastened to the collar, the minimum dimensions allow it to remain almost invisible to the viewer.
  2. studio microphone – is a fairly large device that is placed on a tripod, a special bar or just on a table. Inexpensive models are actively used at home.
  3. Hand microphone – you have known him since childhood, since the singer usually holds him in his hand during his performance. It can also be used in karaoke.
  4. Gun microphone – a separate type of device designed to be mounted on a camcorder or camera.

And this, of course, is not the whole list. For example, on sale you can find head-mounted microphones or even pendant ones. Also, the devices differ in the technology of their work:

  1. dynamic microphone does not require food supply. This means that it will work in tandem with absolutely any device that has the appropriate connector. And it is also distinguished by its ability to cope with differences in sound pressure, as a result of which it is these microphones that are used to record drum kits. But there is also a drawback, which is not the most reliable sound picture.
  2. Condenser microphone much more sensitive, as a result of which it perceives a wider range of sounds. But it requires careful handling, as its insides are very fragile. And this accessory will also need an additional 48 V power supply. If the camcorder or voice recorder supports the phantom power function, then there will be no problems. In other cases, you need to make sure that the microphone has a battery compartment.

There are also ribbon and electret microphones, but their number is very small. First, they are significantly more expensive to manufacture. Secondly, they are almost completely replaced by capacitor, much more versatile devices.

Microphones may have different radiation pattern. It must be indicated on the packaging. It depends on which side the sound will be picked up. For example, lavaliers and tabletop microphones are typically cardioid, supercardioid, or hypercardioid. This means that there will be no external sounds coming from somewhere on the side of the recording. If you are going to use the accessory for, say, Skype conversations, it is better to purchase a model with a pie chart.

Should not be mistaken with connector. It will be very frustrating if the selected microphone does not fit your device due to the inability to connect. The following types of connectors are currently the most popular:

  1. mini jack – the well-known 3.5 mm audio jack. Equipped with such a plug, the microphone can be connected to a variety of devices. Including to a smartphone (sometimes – only with the use of an adapter).
  2. USB and mini jack – desktop and some other models use a combined type of connection. USB in this case is used for power supply.
  3. USB – some microphones connect only via this interface, without requiring a 3.5 mm audio jack. You need to understand that the accessory can only be used in tandem with a computer – it is unlikely that other devices will be able to detect it, even if they also have a USB port (however, some smartphones are an exception to the rule).
  4. XLR – such a connector is usually required by professional microphones connected to the corresponding equipment.
  5. USB and XLR – very few models are connected to two connectors at once.

Perhaps these are the main characteristics that you should pay attention to. Of course, the microphone market is much richer than you think. Therefore, quite specific models can be found on sale. For example, now radio microphones are becoming more and more popular, which allow you not to bother with the wire. If you do not want to bother yourself with the above characteristics, just focus on our selection. We carefully selected the product, focusing on its specifications, user experience, which is described in numerous reviews, and stories from manufacturers. We also took into account the reviews – for example, when getting acquainted with USB microphones, we were helped by colleagues from the foreign edition of PC Magazine, who carried out their comprehensive testing.

Rating of the best microphones for recording

Nomination Place Name Price
The best dynamic microphones

one

Sennheiser MD421 II

34 590 ₽

2

Shure SM7B

26 140 ₽

3

RODE PodMic

10 070 ₽

four

Shure SM58

17 357 ₽

Best Condenser Microphones for Vocal Recording

one

Neumann TLM-102

52 590 ₽

2

Blue Microphones Bluebird SL

29 990 ₽

3

AKG C214

28 990 ₽

four

RODE NT1-A

28 310 ₽

5

Audio-Technica AT2020USB+

14 290 ₽

6

Blue Yeti X

15 980 ₽

7

Behringer C-1

2 990 ₽

Best Inexpensive Microphones

one

Audio Technica AT2020

8 049 ₽

2

AKG-P120

5 975 ₽

3

BEHRINGER C-1U

2 858 ₽

four

BOYA BY-M1

1 438 ₽

The best dynamic microphones

Sennheiser MD421 II

Rating: 4.9

Sennheiser MD421 II

Some microphones have remained popular over the years. In particular, the Sennheiser MD421 has been in demand for at least 35 years! And only some time ago, the manufacturer decided to improve this model by releasing the second generation. This dynamic cardioid microphone exceeded all expectations. It turned out to be relatively compact, while inside it is advanced electronics.

The device is universal, and this is exactly what you want to get for such a large amount (in our country they ask for 34 thousand rubles for a microphone). With this accessory, you can write not only musical instruments, but also vocals. Some people use this microphone to record speech for podcasts or vlogs. The result is perfect – sound processing in the editor is needed only in some exceptional cases. The product also features support for bass cutoff. In a word, Sennheiser MD421 II can be called the leader of our rating!

Advantages

  • Excellent sensitivity;
  • Five positions bass-roll-off;
  • Pronounced focus;
  • The case turned out to be very durable;
  • Maximum dynamic range.

Flaws

  • High price;
  • Comes with microphone and clip only.

Also Read: 12 Best Karaoke Microphones

Shure SM7B

Rating: 4.9

SHURE SM7B

Do you think that a dynamic microphone is not capable of picking up a very wide dynamic range? In this case, we suggest that you familiarize yourself with the Shure SM7B. Despite the fact that its manufacturer made a name for itself with the condenser microphone (it was he who invented it in 1932), the company is still developing dynamic models. If we talk specifically about Shure SM7B, then this is a studio accessory that conveys all the beauty of vocals. It has not only a pop filter, but also pneumatic cushioning, which completely cuts off the sounds of breathing and mechanical noise.

The microphone has a classic cardioid diaphragm, which is ideal for recording sound in the studio. And the product received electromagnetic protection against interference. This means that neither monitors, nor computers, nor smartphones, nor other equipment will affect the recording of crystal clear sound.

Shure SM7B is primarily used for vocal recording. In this case, you will definitely be pleased with the warm sound of the resulting composition. And not only you, but all other listeners. However, the manufacturer on its product page assures that the microphone is suitable even for recording musical instruments. This is due to the fact that a dynamic capsule is used here, which can boast a wide frequency response. In short, it is very different from the capsules that are part of most competitors. And because of this, this model turned out to be very expensive.

The manufacturer’s statement is confirmed by the opinion of buyers. For example, one of the Yandex.Market visitors has been using the Shure SM7B for over a year, and he wrote the following: “Vocals, broadcasting, instruments, whatever. The best dynamic microphone, in fact, as well as some other dynamic ones from SHURE. We tend to agree with him, founded in 1925, the company knows a lot about this technique.

It remains to add that the connection of the 765-gram model to the equipment is carried out via the XLR interface. If for some reason you decide to purchase a microphone for home use, then make sure that such a connector is available.

Advantages

  • A cardioid polar pattern is used;

  • Perfectly fights against mechanical sounds and breathing noise;

  • Long service life;

  • Suitable not only for recording vocals;

  • Does not require additional power;

  • Good equipment;

  • There are switches for attenuating and amplifying frequencies.

Flaws

  • The price won’t suit everyone.

RODE PodMic

Rating: 4.8

RODE PodMic

This studio microphone has an attractive design and impressive performance. Despite belonging to the dynamic type, the device is ready to perceive a very wide range of audio frequencies. The manufacturer claims a starting mark of 20 Hz, which allows you to record even percussion instruments. Tests in the hands of experts, if they do not confirm the words said by the creators of RODE PodMic, then they say that they are as close to the truth as possible.

According to a study by MusicTech.net, the microphone is almost perfect for recording vocals. A stand is found in the box with the product. We mention it only because it has easily rotating nuts, thanks to which you can fine-tune the position of the microphone. With its cardioid polar pattern, this is very important, because the device will not record sounds from the side and behind. And for many competitors, it is the stand that is the weakest link.

Despite being a dynamic type, the RODE PodMic still requires phantom power. However, in a studio environment, this will not be a big problem. As well as connection via a three-pin XLR connector. Not to mention the metal body. Partly because of him, the scales under the microphone show 937. And this is by no means a drawback.

This model has a built-in shock absorber and an internal pop filter. However, one cannot but admit that they are not 100% coping with their task. If you want to cut off absolutely all breath sounds, then get ready to spend about $ 15 on an external pop filter. But the manufacturer could put it in the kit … However, this is the only serious drawback of this microphone. And this is at far from its highest cost! Someone else might complain about the lack of switches to attenuate or boost certain frequencies, but for a microphone with such a price tag, this is quite forgivable.

It remains to add that the site mentioned above concluded that the RODE PodMic is slightly better suited for recording a male voice than a female one. And experts also noted the good sensitivity of the microphone – it is a little louder than most other dynamic models, also intended for studio use.

Advantages

  • Comes with a well-made stand;

  • The price cannot be called unbearable;

  • Perceives a wide range of sound frequencies;

  • The microphone turned out to be weighty and reliable;

  • The case is made of stainless steel;

  • Good sensitivity.

Flaws

  • No external pop filter included;

  • There are no attenuation and frequency amplification switches.

Shure SM58

Rating: 4.8

Shure SM58

This microphone has a traditional appearance, as if it was intended for an ordinary karaoke. But the product would not have got into our rating if it did not have impressive characteristics and a lot of positive feedback from satisfied customers. The dynamic cardioid microphone has a frequency response of 50 Hz to 15 kHz. This means that the device transmits all the nuances of the human voice. Sound distortion here, even at high SPL, has a minimum level. Surprisingly, the manufacturer did a great job even on the windscreen, which does an excellent job of eliminating wind and breathing noise. And there is also a built-in capsule damper, which already reduces mechanical noise.

Shure is famous for the fact that its microphones can be used for many years. The SM58 model is no exception to the rule – you can safely drop it, this will not affect the technical condition of the device in any way. The buyer should also be pleased with the fact that a standard XLR connector is used here – this makes it easy to find a longer or additional cable for the microphone.

Overall, this is an excellent microphone for vocal recording, as well as for use in theatre, circus, concert or anywhere else. Hardly for 9 thousand rubles. you can buy a better quality vocal microphone.

Advantages

  • Quality assembly;
  • Wide frequency range;
  • Excellent wind protection with filter;
  • Good suppression of mechanical noise;
  • The kit includes not only a holder, but also a case with a strap;
  • An XLR connector is used.

Flaws

  • Unsuitable for musical instruments (with the exception of wind instruments).

Best Condenser Microphones for Vocal Recording

Neumann TLM-102

Rating: 4.9

Neumann TLM-102

This microphone, which costs up to 45 thousand rubles, is used in studios and radio stations. He looks very stylish. Moreover, this can be said about both the silver version and the black one. The German manufacturer endowed his creation with a very large membrane that captures all the subtleties of the human voice. At the same time, a cardioid polar pattern is used here, which saves from recording extraneous sounds.

By default, the Neumann TLM-102 microphone is designed for vocal recording. However, it is regularly used for other purposes – for example, the device is placed near drums, guitar amplifiers and other sources of loud sounds. It is interesting that the product is able to raise the sound in the mid-frequency region – that is, this way you can clearly distinguish the human voice in the mix. The anti-vibration fastening of the capsule should also please the buyer, which ensures the absence of mechanical noise. The microphone comes with a rather heavy metal holder SG 2, made on articulated mechanisms.

Advantages

  • Two color options are available;
  • The capsule rests on an anti-vibration mount;
  • The microphone is able to correctly highlight the voice;
  • The sound is as clear as possible;
  • Excellent metal holder included;
  • The device can be called universal;
  • The microphone can last for many years.

Flaws

  • Not everyone will like the price tag.

Blue Microphones Bluebird SL

Rating: 4.8

Blue Microphones Bluebird SL

Relatively inexpensive studio microphone. Its cost does not exceed 20 thousand rubles, due to which it got into the rating of the Expertology online magazine. The device has a metal case, painted in blue. The product includes a -20 dB filter as well as a high-pass filter – all of which make the microphone an excellent choice for capturing vocals. And not only! This device is used to capture sound from pianos, guitars and many other musical instruments. The device will certainly please you with rich lows, soft mids and clear highs.

This is one of the few condenser microphones that uses a hand-built capsule. And this model is also able to please the Meylar diaphragm with a golden coating. When recording vocals, it provides excellent resonance. It is impossible not to note the relief part of the fixed electrode, thanks to which the sound of the entire frequency spectrum is perfectly balanced.

Advantages

  • Suitable for recording both voice and musical instruments;
  • There is a Meylar diaphragm with a golden coating;
  • There is a high-pass filter and a -20 dB filter;
  • The microphone is partly hand-built;
  • Minimum noise level;
  • Durable construction.

Flaws

  • The price tag still can not be called low;
  • Not everyone likes the design.

Also Read: 10 Best Microphones for Streaming

AKG C214

Rating: 4.7

AKG C214

The only microphone in our rating, supplied in a special case. This greatly simplifies the transportation of the device from, say, one studio to another. The device is, like all the microphones discussed here, cardioid. The operating frequency range here is from 20 MHz to 20 kHz. The sound is picked up by an inch diaphragm. And she copes with this task quite well – it is not without reason that this model is used by some popular musicians.

Returning to the topic of equipment, one cannot fail to mention the presence of wind protection. This simple accessory allows you to use the microphone outdoors without worrying about sound quality. Also, the buyer receives the H85 holder, with which you can adjust the inclination of the device.

When developing the AKG C214, the German manufacturer applied a completely new electronic circuit. This made it possible to significantly increase the dynamic range. Also, the product is able to boast of a flat frequency response. It is curious that the microphone can withstand almost any sound pressure – this is facilitated by the special design of the capsule, which excludes the short circuit of the membrane with the rear electrode.

Advantages

  • Excellent protection against radio interference;
  • Reliable and durable metal construction;
  • Rich equipment;
  • There is a sensitivity switch (-20 dB filter);
  • You can turn on the high pass filter;
  • Protection against any sound pressure;
  • Low self-noise level.

Flaws

  • The cost reaches 30 thousand rubles.

RODE NT1-A

Rating: 4.7

RODE NT1-A

RODE Microphones was founded in 1967. It began its history with the maintenance and modification of professional audio systems. A few years later, she began to create a similar technique herself. Well, the RODE NT1-A condenser microphone made its name, which, however, received such a name a little later. This device is still being produced, but in a significantly improved form.

This model is bought by the creators of podcasts, and the organizers of recording studios, and broadcasting companies. Assembled in Australia, the microphone connects to the equipment via an XLR connector (you can use the supplied 6-meter cable). The device requires phantom power 24 or 48 V. But this is not a problem – almost all existing mixing consoles can provide it. What can I say, this function is even in professional camcorders.

One of the buyers of RODE NT1-A left his opinion on the “Otzovik”. You can listen to his opinion, as he has earned an excellent reputation. This user notes: “One of the main advantages of this microphone is the ultra-low self-noise level – 5 dBA”. And indeed. The trouble with many condenser microphones is that they introduce their own noise into the sound. Here, there is no such problem. That is why this model can be safely used to record vocals or musical instruments. Not to mention podcasts.

RODE NT1-A has been in stable demand for many years. Therefore, it is not surprising that it deserves positive ratings not only from ordinary users, but also from specialized publications. For example, a test from DJ-Store.ru showed that this microphone is a “universal workhorse”. The author of the review found fault mainly with mere trifles. For example, the manufacturer built a pop filter into the mount, making it non-removable. This is of course not the best solution. There is also no high-pass filter, which is perhaps the most different from the more expensive studio microphones, the RODE NT1-A.

Under the gold-plated membrane of this device, inch capsules are hidden. The weight of this model is only 326 g. It is proposed to use the supplied case to store the microphone. Even in the box with the RODE NT1-A, the SM6 anti-vibration mount will be found.

Advantages

  • Classic cardioid polar pattern;

  • The body is made of metal;

  • Wide range of perceived sound frequencies;

  • Good sensitivity;

  • Good equipment;

  • The contacts are gold plated.

Flaws

  • The pop filter is part of the stand;

  • The price is still not low;

  • No high pass filter.

Audio-Technica AT2020USB+

Rating: 4.6

Audio-Technica AT2020USB+

This is one of the most affordable studio microphones available. It differs from many others in the connection method – the device needs a USB interface. It is because of this that this model rarely finds a place for itself in recording studios. But on the other hand, she is loved by those who regularly write podcasts or make videos for YouTube. Such people appreciated the pure sound that is obtained at the output.

The microphone is able to please with a rich bundle. It comes with not only a desktop stand, but also a 5/8″ to 3/8″ stand adapter. Also in the box you will find a soft bag for transportation, a mount and a USB cable.

The Audio-Technica AT2020USB+ is highly rated by the Geeksrising authors (and these guys ate the dog on all sorts of podcasts). The review commends the 3.5mm headphone jack. This allows the sound engineer or the author of the material being prepared to evaluate the work of the microphone, adjust it before the start of the broadcast. Only two controls are used to make adjustments here. Unfortunately, there are no knobs for attenuating or boosting certain frequencies.

Experts note that the manufacturer did not lie when he announced the perceived frequency range of 20 Hz – 20 kHz. Testing has shown that there are no skips or drops in frequencies. Also, the creators of the microphone declared a cardioid polar pattern. But in fact, the device can pick up sounds even from the side or from below – in particular, during the test, the audio recording retained weak clicks from working with the keyboard. And that is why the Audio-Technica AT2020USB + is by no means the first place in our rating.

This microphone can be safely taken not only for voice recording. He is also good at recording musical instruments. In general, a certain Yandex.Market visitor spoke best about this model, who wished to hide his name. This microphone has been at his disposal for more than a year. The man writes: “However, as an experienced sound engineer, I can say that for a simple home studio on a limited budget, this microphone is enough, and if this is also your first studio microphone, then even more so”.

Advantages

  • Not very high cost;

  • There is a headphone output;

  • Wide range of perceived sound frequencies;

  • Long service life.

Flaws

  • Too wide cardioid polar pattern;

  • There aren’t many adjustments available;

  • Microphones from a fresh batch are sold without a stand;

  • The connection method will not suit everyone.

Blue Yeti X

Rating: 4.6

BLUE YETI X

An unprepared person might think that the Blue Yeti X is the creation of some Chinese company. But no! Blue Microphones is a subsidiary of Logitech founded in 1995. She knows a lot about both studio and consumer microphones. And it is precisely because of this that the price of the Blue Yeti X is fully justified. By the way, she’s not that tall.

Many amateur microphones sold under this brand interact with equipment via a USB interface. This model is no exception to the rule. This means that you will not be able to connect the accessory to your camcorder, especially if it is not of the professional type. The body of the microphone is made of metal. Inside there are very bulky components. As a result, the product weighs 1280 g – this is one of the heaviest microphones in our selection.

This model allows you to notice in time that the gain is insufficient or exceeds reasonable limits – this will be indicated by the LED indicator. The microphone also received a large button that plays the role of a command center – with its help you can switch between operating modes, adjust the gain level, and also turn off the device. Mixing is available in one of the modes. Streamers will especially like this feature – this feature will allow you to quickly find a balance between the sounds of the game and your own comments.

Unlike professional models, Blue Yeti X does not oblige you to rely solely on cardioid directivity. By default, the microphone uses it, but you can quickly switch to other modes of operation. Bidirectional, omnidirectional and stereo modes are available here! In a word, it all depends on what exactly you are going to write, and in what conditions.

The foreign edition of PC Magazine gave this USB microphone a solid four. Why not the highest rating? The fact is that the manufacturer stinted on the pop filter. But this is not the worst. Much more disappointing is the lack of an adapter for a standard microphone stand. The creators believe that their product will stand exclusively on the table. Also, the authors of the review were confused by the lack of an equalizer – in order to work with certain audio frequencies, you need to use auxiliary software. But all these disadvantages are mere trifles that can be easily put up with.

Advantages

  • A four-capacitor capsule is used;

  • The body was made of metal;

  • There is an LED load indicator;

  • Convenient and functional software from Logitech;

  • The price cannot be called extremely high;

  • There is a headphone jack;

  • Fast switching between different operating modes.

Flaws

  • The connection method will not appeal to everyone;

  • There is no pop filter;

  • A mic stand adapter would be nice;

  • There is no function of attenuating and amplifying certain frequencies.

Behringer C-1

Rating: 4.5

Behringer C-1

One of the cheapest condenser microphones, unless, of course, you remember about Chinese creations. The cost of Behringer C-1 in our stores is approximately 5 thousand rubles. Such a price tag allows you to think about buying this device even for an ordinary consumer who is not going to make money by recording sound or shooting video. The microphone received a relatively good metal case and a gold-plated XLR connector. Despite the low cost, the device pleases with the almost complete absence of its own noise. Namely, noise is a problem with Chinese models that also use phantom power.

Of course, the sound quality recorded with the Behringer C-1 cannot be called studio quality. Nevertheless, the capabilities of such a microphone are quite enough to add some story dictated during editing to the video about your family’s vacation trip. It’s also a great choice for people writing podcasts. They will be quite satisfied with a medium-sized diaphragm, as will they be pleased with the cardioid pattern, which excludes the recording of external noise.

Advantages

  • There is a phantom power indicator;
  • Comes with stand adapter and case.
  • Utilizes an ultra-low-noise FET front-end circuit;
  • Rugged construction;
  • A gold-plated XLR connector is used;
  • Low cost.

Flaws

  • Not the widest frequency range
  • Sensitivity could be higher.

Best Inexpensive Microphones

Audio Technica AT2020

Rating: 4.7

AUDIO-TECHNICA AT2020.jpg

This is a very affordable studio microphone. To connect it, a three-pin XLR connector is used. Also, the device must be provided with phantom power. Only in this case, the Audio-Technica AT2020 will please with a sufficiently high sensitivity, albeit not a record one (around -37 dB).

The microphone has been in production for at least fifteen years. And he is in constant demand. And this despite the presence inside the electret capsule, the diameter of which is only 16 mm. It seems to many that this size does not allow you to make the sound warm and dense enough. However, it is not! You will definitely like the result of the recording. Yes, there is a dip in the region of 70 Hz, but it is quite insignificant. This is evidenced by detailed testing from Paul White, published on the SoundOnSound website. This expert also claims that the device can be safely used to record acoustic guitar – not necessarily limited to voice.

The body of this microphone is made of metal. A complete mount was also created from it. By the way, in the box with the device you will find an adapter for a standard microphone stand. But you won’t get a pop filter. But on the other hand, the manufacturer was generous with a good case, complemented by a soft lining.

The Audio-Technica AT2020 has a cardioid polar pattern. But slightly wider than the more expensive microphones of this type. What is happening behind the device is not audible at all. But when recording a podcast, you need to be careful – along with your voice, sounds from the keyboard can also be heard, albeit very quietly. This is a well-known feature of this model, with which it is quite possible to live.

Finally, it is impossible not to note the nice appearance of the device. It can be judged by the opinion of a resident of Tula, published on Otzovik: “The design of the microphone immediately attracted my attention – it looks beautiful and concise on the desktop. I have already recorded a bunch of videos, there is no loss of quality. ”

Advantages

  • Not very high cost;

  • Cute design;

  • Comes with case, adapter and stand mount;

  • Good sensitivity;

  • Wide range of perceived frequencies;

  • Long service life.

Flaws

  • No pop filter included

  • Too wide cardioid polar pattern;

  • Provides no special settings;

  • The noise level is slightly above average.

AKG-P120

Rating: 4.6

AKG-P120

The Austrian company AKG has existed since 1947. It is familiar to many consumers for its excellent audio equipment. Now she is part of the Harman International Industries concern, but this does not change anything – AKG products generally deserve good reviews. So why aren’t there many reviews of the AKG P120 microphone on the internet? The fact is that this model is somewhere on the verge between the budget and medium price segments. Many believe that such a device will not be in special demand. It’s sad, because the product has good technical characteristics.

In the box with the 455-gram microphone, you can only find a stand mount. Alas, in order to reduce the cost, the manufacturer had to abandon all kinds of additional accessories that would make life easier for the user – for example, a pop filter will have to be purchased separately. An XLR jack is used to connect to equipment. The microphone requires phantom power. With it, the sensitivity is -32.5 dB, which can be considered a good result.

One of the buyers in his review noted a decent thickness of the microphone. It may not seem like a problem. However, in reality, this places serious demands on the rack. In cheap Chinese, this instance may simply not fit.

Other characteristics of the device can not but rejoice. The microphone remarkably picks up almost all sound frequencies – from 20 Hz to 20 kHz. It provides a cardioid polar pattern. This means that what is happening somewhere behind the microphone will definitely be off the record. And it is also one of the cheapest models among those that are endowed with an attenuator.

Advantages

  • Good sensitivity;

  • The microphone turned out to be universal;

  • There is a PAD;

  • Low cost;

  • Classic cardioid polar pattern;

  • There is a low pass filter.

Flaws

  • Poor equipment;

  • Noise level is slightly above average;

  • The design won’t suit everyone.

BEHRINGER C-1U

Rating: 4.5

BEHRINGER C-1U

Can a high-quality microphone be sold for 3 thousand rubles? Yes, but it will have a number of simplifications. For example, they ask for such money for a stationary BEHRINGER C-1U. The manufacturer positions it as a studio, and even a concert one. We would be careful not to take it for such use, unless the concert will take place in a rural house of culture. However, not everything is as bad as you might think.

The body of the device is made of metal. There are no unnecessary details on it – no buttons, no controls, no headphone output. The product box contains a USB cable, a mount and a 5/8″ to 3/8″ microphone stand adapter. You could already understand what type of connection is used here. The USB interface implies that the equipment will receive already processed sound – if an equalizer is available, then you should not count on its ideal work. However, the result should suit everyone who is still shooting video and recording music on a non-professional basis. This is confirmed by testing from GeeksRising, during which a decent sound was obtained both when recording vocals, and when playing acoustic guitar, and even when recording electric guitar. Small problems begin only with the upper frequencies – the capsule implemented here is maximally capable of perceiving only 16 kHz. If you are worried about this, it is recommended to find a version with an XLR connector – it has an extended frequency range.

This model has a cardioid polar pattern. But it is slightly wider than stated. Therefore, when buying such a microphone, it is better to equip your home studio in an appropriate way, in this case, the audio recording will definitely not be equipped with unnecessary noise. By the way, what is happening under the microphone is almost inaudible – typing on the keyboard did not get into the test recording.

The sensitivity of this device is average. It is better to bring it as close to your mouth as possible, otherwise the final recording will be too quiet. This is another reason why the owner of a professional studio will definitely not buy such a microphone.

Advantages

  • The body of the microphone is made of metal;

  • Low cost;

  • Good elimination of background noise;

  • The simplest use;

  • A very rich set.

Flaws

  • The mount is made of plastic;

  • USB connection is used;

  • Not very high sensitivity;

  • The microphone does not provide any settings.

BOYA BY-M1

Rating: 4.4

BOYA BY-M1

Basically, our selection consists of studio microphones. This does not mean that they can only be used by professionals. But one cannot but admit that it is definitely impossible to use them somewhere outside the premises. In such conditions, a lavalier microphone comes to the rescue. And that is exactly what the BOYA BY-M1 is.

If a person decides to order a buttonhole on conditional AliExpress, then in 95% of cases he makes his choice in favor of BOYA BY-M1. Why? For several reasons. Firstly, the product has already been tested by time – it has been produced for more than a year. Secondly, this lavalier microphone is much cheaper than competitors produced by more famous companies. However, it is not inferior to them in many ways!

This model is condenser. However, phantom power is not required. This allows you to connect the microphone to absolutely any device that has a 3.5mm audio input. In some cases, you will only need to move the switch to the appropriate position so that the microphone begins to receive power from the installed battery.

We recommend that you change the battery in time! Alas, the design of the microphone is such that no one will warn you that the battery is dead. And be sure to train yourself to turn off the BOYA BY-M1 after shooting is over – the device will not do this automatically, continuing to consume energy.

This “button” is wired. This may seem to limit its use. But it’s not! The length of the wire is 6 m, so you can move within a fairly wide range. And if the microphone is connected to a smartphone or voice recorder, then there will be no problems at all. Except for one. The thin cable is constantly tangled, increasing the preparation time for recording. It would be nice if in the future the manufacturer put something like a tape measure into the kit, on which this wire would be wound. But so far he has become generous only on the cover. Even high-quality wind protection will have to be bought separately (however, some stores put a “fluffy” as a gift).

As for the quality of the final material, it is quite difficult to find fault with it. The sound is not overwhelmed in any of the frequency ranges, it does not require special processing. It should be noted that the microphone has an omnidirectional pattern, so you can easily turn your head – the sound will not become much quieter. No wonder people leave mostly positive reviews.

Advantages

  • Very low cost;

  • Long wire;

  • The microphone can be battery operated;

  • Good sensitivity;

  • Structural elements are equipped with clips.

Flaws

  • No indication of battery level;

  • Does not remind you to turn off;

  • The cable gets tangled all the time.

Conclusion

These are the best microphones in existence at the moment. Of course, we were talking here only about the most affordable models. We decided not to talk about expensive professional microphones, which TV channels usually order directly from the manufacturer. It seems to us that Expertology readers will not need such devices due to the complexity of their purchase and the very high cost. Also, we have not mentioned the “buttonlets”, which will be discussed in a separate article.